Telemedicine and Malpractice: New Risks in Modern Healthcare

Telemedicine has transformed the way patients in Seattle and across Washington access healthcare. From virtual primary care visits to remote mental health counseling and post-surgical follow-ups, technology has made medical care more convenient than ever.

But as telemedicine expands, so do the risks.

For patients harmed by negligent virtual care, understanding how telemedicine malpractice works is critical. At its core, medical malpractice law in Washington still applies, but the digital format introduces new legal and medical complexities.

The Rise of Telemedicine in Washington State

During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth became a permanent part of modern healthcare. Providers now use video conferencing platforms, secure messaging portals, and remote monitoring tools to diagnose and treat patients.

Common telemedicine services include:

  • Virtual urgent care visits,
  • Remote prescription management,
  • Tele-psychiatry and teletherapy,
  • Post-operative follow-ups, and
  • Chronic disease monitoring.

While these tools increase access, they also change how doctors gather information, and that shift can impact patient safety.

How Telemedicine Can Lead to Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider fails to meet the accepted standard of care, causing injury. In telemedicine cases, negligence often arises from the limitations of virtual care.

Examples of types of negligence include:

1. Misdiagnosis or Delayed Diagnosis

Without a physical examination, providers may miss critical signs and symptoms. Subtle findings like swelling, abnormal heart sounds, neurological deficits, or skin changes can be difficult or impossible to evaluate through a screen.

If a provider fails to order appropriate in-person testing or imaging when needed, a serious condition may go undiagnosed.

2. Failure to Escalate to In-Person Care

A key issue in telemedicine malpractice cases is whether the provider should have referred the patient for an emergency room evaluation, in-person examination, diagnostic imaging, or laboratory testing.

If a reasonable provider would have required hands-on assessment but the telehealth doctor did not, that may constitute negligence.

3. Technology Failures and Communication Breakdowns

Poor video quality, dropped calls, lagging audio, and incomplete medical records can interfere with proper evaluation.

Additional risks include:

  • Misunderstanding symptoms,
  • Incomplete documentation,
  • Failure to review prior medical history, and
  • Cybersecurity breaches affecting patient data.

While technical glitches alone are not malpractice, providers remain responsible for ensuring patient care meets professional standards.

4. Informed Consent in Virtual Care

Patients have the right to understand the limitations of telemedicine. A provider should explain:

  • The risks of remote diagnosis,
  • Alternatives, including in-person care, and
  • When emergency care is necessary.

Failure to obtain proper informed consent can be a basis for a malpractice claim.

Does the Legal Standard Change for Telemedicine?

In Washington, the legal standard of care remains the same: what would a reasonably prudent healthcare provider do under similar circumstances?

However, “similar circumstances” now includes telehealth settings.

A provider cannot hide behind the virtual format. If the standard of care required physical evaluation, referral, or testing, the provider must act accordingly – even during a video visit.

When Should You Speak With a Seattle Medical Malpractice Attorney?

Please note that you may have a legitimate medical malpractice claim if:

  • A serious condition was missed during a virtual visit,
  • You were told symptoms were minor but later required emergency care,
  • A provider failed to recommend in-person evaluation, and/or
  • You suffered harm due to delayed diagnosis.

Telemedicine should expand access to care – not reduce safety standards.

If you or a loved one was harmed by negligent telehealth treatment in Washington, speaking with an experienced Seattle medical malpractice attorney can help you understand your rights and options.

Contact Otorowski & Golden, PLLC

Please know that our firm is here to help if you were injured due to a medical provider’s malpractice. Otorowski & Golden, PLLC provides free consultations to all our potential clients. The attorneys at our law firm also have over 120 years of combined experience representing injured parties in medical malpractice cases. They never back down to insurers and fight for their clients’ interests every step of the way. Do yourself a favor and contact them now for the quality legal representation you deserve.

Privacy Policy